Why Luxury Isn’t Always Sustainable: Fighting Exploitation with American-Made Fishing Gear

Why Luxury Isn’t Always Sustainable: Fighting Exploitation with American-Made Fishing Gear

What does Louis Vuitton have to do with Fly fishing?
Recently, I’ve been digging into this wild situation with luxury clothing brands for my marketing class. Chinese factories are posting on X, showing how they make stuff like a $34,000 Birkin bag for just $1,400, and saying the big price tag is all about the brand name, not the quality. It’s tied to the U.S.-China trade war, but it’s also showing how luxury brands aren’t always sustainable—especially when it comes to how they exploit cheap labor overseas for insane profit margins. In the fly fishing world, we see this with brands like Simms, who make most of their gear overseas and charge a fortune, while Orvis, though still making some items in the USA, has cut back on domestic production. We need to do better.

Luxury’s Big Problem: Exploiting Cheap Labor for High Margins

Luxury brands like Louis Vuitton and Chanel make you think you’re getting the best of the best—amazing quality, fancy designs, and a status symbol. But here’s the deal: that $34,000 Birkin bag isn’t 24 times better than the $1,400 version from the same factory. The Chinese suppliers are spilling the beans, saying the huge price is mostly for the logo, not better craftsmanship. They’re exploiting workers to keep costs low while raking in massive profits:
  • Exploiting Cheap Labor for Crazy Margins: Luxury brands often set up shop in places like China, Vietnam, or Cambodia, where they can pay workers next to nothing. The New York Times says tariffs are at 54% for Chinese goods, 46% for Vietnam, and 49% for Cambodia as of early April 2025, showing how much they rely on these low-cost regions. Workers there might make just a few dollars a day, working long hours in tough conditions, all so brands can keep their costs down and charge you a fortune. In the fly fishing world, Simms is a prime example—they make most of their gear overseas, like their jackets and wading boots, often in China, yet sell it at stupidly high prices. A user on a fishing forum pointed out that Simms’ pro shell jacket is labeled “Made in China,” despite their Bozeman, Montana branding, and they’re still charging premium prices for it. That’s a ridiculous markup when you think about how little they’re paying the workers who made it.
  • Shipping Adds Up: Luxury brands ship their stuff all over the world, burning fuel and creating pollution. With the trade war heating up—Trump’s tariffs are at 125% on Chinese imports as of April 11, 2025, and China’s hitting back with 84% on U.S. goods—it’s getting messier. All that shipping isn’t sustainable, and it’s a far cry from supporting local workers who deserve fair pay.
  • Ignoring Local Jobs: By chasing cheap labor overseas, luxury brands aren’t creating good jobs here at home. A guy on X,  @politickingjay, said China’s trying to “cast a heavy blow” to luxury brands by exposing all this, and I can see why—it’s showing how they’re more about boosting their bottom line than doing right by workers.
What Luxury—and Some Fishing Brands—Get Wrong About Sustainability

Luxury brands often try to look sustainable, but a lot of it feels like a front, especially when they’re exploiting workers to keep costs low. Here’s where they, and some fishing brands, are dropping the ball:
  • Greenwashing Hype: Some brands talk up using a little recycled material, but they’re still exploiting cheap labor overseas to make their stuff. Simms, for example, brags about their Bozeman roots, but a lot of their gear—like jackets and boots—is made in China, where workers are underpaid, and then sold at a huge markup. It’s like me saying I’m sustainable because I use a reusable water bottle, but then I’m buying cheap gear made by underpaid workers—it doesn’t add up.
  • All About the Logo, Not the People: That $34,000 Birkin bag isn’t sustainable just because it’s “luxury.” The Chinese factories are showing the price is mostly for the brand name, not better quality or fair labor practices. Simms does the same with their gear—charging premium prices for stuff made overseas, where workers are paid pennies, just because it’s got their name on it. Someone on X, @tmendis, said this might change how people see luxury, and I think they’re right—why not spend on gear that’s made right here, supporting workers who are paid fairly?
  • Missing the Chance to Lead: Luxury brands and companies like Simms could set an example by making stuff in the USA and paying fair wages, but most don’t. Orvis used to make more of their rods in the USA, like in Vermont, but they’ve shifted a lot of production overseas over the years, though they still make some items here. We need to get back to making more gear at home, supporting our own communities.
Why This Matters for Fly Fishers

As fly fishers, we want gear that’s high-quality and built to last—stuff that can handle a long day on the water without letting us down. But we also care about doing things the right way, and that means supporting brands that don’t exploit workers:
  • Quality Over Hype: Luxury brands and companies like Simms are all about the logo, but I’d rather have gear that’s made with care right here in the USA by workers who are paid fairly. At Middleforkfly.com, I’m focused on creating rods, flies, and accessories that are top-notch, not just overpriced for the sake of a name.
  • Supporting Fair Labor: When we buy gear made in the USA, we’re putting people to work with wages they can actually live on—not just scraping by like the workers luxury brands and Simms exploit overseas. Orvis still makes some of their rods in the USA, which is a step in the right direction, but we need more brands to follow suit.
Let’s Fish with Gear That’s Made Right

Here’s how we can make better choices as fly fishers, without falling for luxury hype that exploits workers:
  • Go for Quality, Not a Logo: Skip the overpriced stuff that’s all about the brand name and made by underpaid workers overseas. 
  • Support American Jobs: Look for gear made in the USA—it creates jobs for our communities and pays wages folks can live on, unlike the cheap labor luxury brands and Simms exploit. Orvis still makes some rods in the USA, which is great, but we need more brands to step up and bring production back home.
  • Fix, Don’t Toss: Just like I fixed the carburetors on my 1972 BMW R75/5 instead of buying a new bike, try to repair your gear instead of replacing it. It saves money and keeps us from adding to the waste luxury brands create.
  • Live Greener with Ecolivable.com: Check out Ecolivable.com for eco-friendly products that go hand-in-hand with your fishing—like reusable gear bags that are made sustainably and support fair labor practices, not exploitation.
Wrapping It Up

Luxury isn’t always sustainable, and this drama with Chinese factories and luxury brands shows why. They’re exploiting cheap labor overseas, paying workers next to nothing while charging a fortune for a logo, and ignoring the chance to support fair wages and local jobs. In the fly fishing world, Simms is doing the same—making most of their gear overseas and selling it at ridiculous margins, while Orvis has cut back on USA production, though they still make some rods here. We’ve got to do better. At Middleforkfly.com, I’m focusing on high-quality rods, flies, and gear made right here in the USA, creating good jobs for Americans who take pride in their craft.
Let’s fish with quality, not logos. Tight lines!
Back to blog